How can we help you...

Issue - meetings

Title of Application / Description and Planning Ref Number

Meeting: 17/03/2021 - Local Review Body of Aberdeen City Council (Item 3)

3 24 Goodhope Road - Installation of Raised Timber Decking with External Steps and Boundary Wall to the Rear - Planning Reference: 201035 pdf icon PDF 2 MB

Minutes:

The LRB then considered the second request for a review to evaluate the decision taken by an appointed officer under the Council’s Scheme of Delegation to refuse the application for the installation of raised timber decking with external steps and boundary wall to the rear of 24 Goodhope Road, Aberdeen, Planning Reference number 201035/DPP.

 

In relation to the application, the LRB had before it (1) a delegated report by Jamie Leadbeater, Planner; (2) the application dated 1 September 2020; (3) the decision notice dated 2 February 2021 (4) links to the plans showing the proposal and planning policies referred to in the delegated report; and (5) the Notice of Review submitted by the agent along with an accompanying statement.

 

The Local Review Body then heard from Mr Evans explain that the review had been submitted with all necessary information within the time limit of three months following the decision of the appointed officer.

 

He explained that the applicant had indicated on the Notice of Review that no new matters, which were not before the appointed officer at the time of the original decision, had been raised in the review submission and in terms of the procedure by which the review would be conducted, however they had appended a set of plans which show proposals for additional boundary fencing to assist in mitigating any concerns over loss of privacy for reference. These plans were submitted during the course of the application, however the applicant ultimately decided to proceed with the original proposal.

 

He indicated that the LRB’s role was to review the same proposal which was refused by the appointed officer, so the plans showing additional fencing were included for reference only. He intimated that the applicant had requested that a site inspection be undertaken, highlighting that the appointed officer’s decision was made without visiting the site, therefore they had not determined the minimal impact this proposal would have on the neighbouring properties.

 

Mr Evans then described the site advising that it was a residential curtilage of a modern two storey semi-detached dwellinghouse on Goodhope Road in Bucksburn, to the north of Auchmill Road and the Aerden-Inverness railway line. To the rear of the property, its 15m deep back garden sloped down to the north east (towards back fence). The last 3m of the garden was much more steeply sloping that the preceding 12m, which was on a more gradual slope.  The rear garden was enclosed by 1.8m high timber fencing along its north-western and north-eastern boundary (to neighbour at 26 and rear boundary respectively).  The boundary to the adjoining semi at number 22 was demarked by a combination of wall and fencing of approx. 3m in height. The rear garden of this neighbouring plot sat at a higher level than the application site. There was a rear access lane (footpath only) beyond the rear boundary, providing rear garden access for neighbouring properties. Neighbouring plots to the north-east sat at a lower level than the upper portion of the application site,  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3