How can we help you...

Agenda and minutes

Venue: Committee Room 2 - Town House. View directions

Contact: Martyn Orchard, tel 01224 523097 or email  morchard@aberdeencity.gov.uk or  Stephanie Dunsmuir on 01224 522503 or email  sdunsmuir@aberdeencity.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

1.

Procedure Note and Guidance for Members

Minutes:

The Forum had before it the procedure note and guidance for members on the operation of Forum meetings.

 

The Forum resolved:-

to note the procedure note and guidance for members.

2.

Minute of Previous Meeting of 18 June 2015 pdf icon PDF 64 KB

Minutes:

The Forum had before it the minute of its previous meeting of 18 June 2015.

 

The Forum resolved:-

to approve the minute.

3.

Former Victoria Road Primary School - 141670 pdf icon PDF 131 KB

Planning Reference – 141670

 

The documents associated with this application can be found at –

http://planning.aberdeencity.gov.uk/PlanningDetail.asp?ref=141670

 

Planning Officer – Andrew Miller

Minutes:

 

With reference to its meeting of 26 January 2015, the Forum had before it a report by the Head of Planning and Sustainable Development on submission of a Proposal of Application Notice which outlined a potential application by Barratt North Scotland for the proposed redevelopment of land at the site of the former Victoria Road School, Victoria Road.  The application had previously been discussed at the Forum in January 2015, but as the proposal had been at a relatively early stage, it had been agreed to invite the developer back to make a further presentation to the Forum once the proposals were more detailed.  The developer explained the proposal in more detail to members, particularly highlighting the intention to reuse as much of the existing granite in the development as possible.

 

The report explained that the proposal of application notice was for a residential development greater than 50 units; along with open space, parking and associated infrastructure.  The Forum heard from the representatives of the applicant who outlined the proposal in greater detail and responded to questions from Members.  Mr Andrew Miller, the Case Officer, then addressed the Forum, providing more detail regarding the planning aspects of the application and responded to questions from the Members.  During the submission, Mr Miller set out the main considerations against which the eventual application would be assessed, namely:-

  • The site was zoned as an opportunity site with the Aberdeen Local Development Plan, and was identified as an opportunity for sensitive residential development, although the wider zoning within the LDP was for mixed use with associated policy H2.

·         Policy D4 (Aberdeen’s Granite Heritage) which encouraged the retention of granite buildings throughout the city, even if not listed or within a conservation area, and required that if the building was demolished, the granite be re-used in the principal elevations of replacement buildings.

  • Design and Layout – including roads, landscaping and open space
  • Proximity to Major Accident Hazard – in relation to the northern half of the site.  Mr Miller advised that during pre-application discussions with the applicant, the system developed by the Health and Safety Executive

 

The site was zoned as an opportunity site with the Aberdeen Local Development Plan, and was identified as an opportunity for sensitive residential development, although the wider zoning within the LDP was for mixed use with associated Policy H2

 

Policy D4 (Aberdeen’s Granite Heritage) which encouraged the retention of granite buildings throughout the city, even if not listed or within a conservation area, and required that if the building was demolished, the granite be re-used in the principal elevations of replacement buildings

 

·       Design and Layout – including roads, landscaping and open space

·       Proximity to Major Accident Hazard - in relation to the northern half of the site

·       Access – in terms of public transport, pedestrian and cycle access and roads

 

Mr Miller advised that the site was also subject to a Tree Preservation Order, and so any proposal to redevelop the site would have to retain as many trees  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.