Agenda item
Community Centres - Progress Towards Implementation of New Lease and Management Agreement (ECS/12/050)
Minutes:
With reference to article 7 of the minute of its previous meeting of 20 September, 2012, the Committee had before it a report by the Acting Director of Education, Culture and Sport which updated members (1) in relation to moving community centres to the “leased” type model, and (2) on the current position of the seven community centres which had leases that were operating on the basis of tacit relocation, and were due to come to an end on 28 November, 2012.
With reference to article 4 of this minute, the Committee heard from (1) Andy Cowie and Alex Mess – Powis Community Centre, (2) Paul O'Connor – Chair of Inchgarth Community Centre, (3) Scott Beattie – Vice Chair of Inchgarth Community Centre, (4) Phil D'Arcy, Wilma Mackland and Brian Allan - Community Learning Centres Forum, (5) David Forbes, Chairman, Future Choices, (6) Marie Adams, Create Aberdeen, and (7) Sylvia Davidson (who spoke both in relation to this item and item 9.2 of the agenda). At this juncture, Councillor McCaig asked if the Convener would consider revisiting the decision to take item 9.2 of the agenda in private, depending on the information forthcoming from Mrs Davidson. The Convener indicated that this decision would not be revisited.
Mr Cowie and Mr Mess intimated that the personable liability issue was the biggest concern for them and asked that the matter be deferred for consideration at a later date; Mr O’Connor also raised the issue of personal liability and suggested that he was being asked to sign a schedule that he had not had sight of; Mr Beattie advised that a petition had been set up online, and read out a number of the comments which had been logged in this regard; Mr D’Arcy, Ms Mackland and Mr Allan asked that all parties get back around the table for further discussions; Mr Forbes spoke about the importance of the community centres in relation to the disabled community; Ms Adams suggested that the Council was ignoring the needs of vulnerable people in the city; and Mrs Davidson requested that members take decisions on this day in the best interest of the community centres.
Members asked a number of questions of the deputations.
The Service Manager for Communities introduced the report and circulated a supplementary paper which updated members on the position of different centres in relation to signing up to the new lease agreements, and legal negotiations which had been ongoing. The supplementary paper also advised that in 2011, Ruthrieston community centre had become a leased centre, at which time the individuals involved decided to set up a new management committee to run the centre. The previous management committee, which had been responsible for running the centre prior to the transfer to the leased model took a decision at that time to dissolve and transfer all their funds to the new management committee.
In working through the paperwork involved in transferring the funds, it had emerged that the former management committee did not have a dissolution clause in its constitution. In the absence of such a clause, the Education, Culture and Sport Committee was (as parent committee of the former management committee) was requested to agree to the transfer of funds to the new Ruthrieston management committee.
The report recommended –
that the Committee:
(I) notes the progress of the following centres, where the leases are continuing on the basis of tacit relation, onto the new lease and management agreement arrangements: Balnagask, Balgownie, Catherine Street, Froghall, Inchgarth, Sheddocksley and Tillydrone community centres;
(II) in respect of these centres, where the management committee has been unable or unwilling to sign up to the new lease and management agreement prior to 28 November 2012, for each of these community centres, to instruct officers to provide a temporary licence for the management committee, within the same terms and conditions of the new lease and management agreement, through to 31 January 2013 (with the exception of constitutional requirements: the association may still be in the process of amending their constitution to one that meets the requirements of the lease and management agreement), subject to clause 5.2.9 in the report;
(III) notes the progress in relation to moving the remaining community centres onto the new lease and management agreement;
(IV) instructs officers to introduce a scheme (including setting criteria) whereby Associations will be invited to apply to the Council around about November/December for financial assistance/contribution towards any outstanding or identified external repairs for which they are liable, but are struggling to afford;
(V) approves the transfer of the funds from the former Ruthrieston management committee to the current Ruthrieston management committee; and
(VI) instructs officers to offer management committees who do not wish to sign up to the lease and management agreement, an alternative option whereby the affected Community Centre would still require to sign a licence to occupy prior to the 28 November 2012, but once the lease expires on 31 January 2013, would be operated in the same way as a community centre attached to a school: i.e. it would be run and managed by the Council, with the management committee inputting into the development of a programme at that site. In this situation, the management committee would no longer be entitled to a Development Grant (from 1 February 2013 onwards), but would still be eligible to receive £625 per year for the purpose of purchasing insurance. It is understood that the transition to such a model may require a reduction in programme at the affected site.
The Committee resolved:
to adopt the successful motion.
In terms of Standing Order 36(3), Councillor McCaig intimated he would like to refer this decision to the next meeting of full Council (19 December, 2012) for final determination. Councillor McCaig was supported by Councillors Cameron, Greig, Jaffrey, McCaig, May, Noble, Samarai, Stewart and Townson.
In terms of Standing Order 36(6), the Convener ruled that such a reference would have the effect of depriving the Council of the opportunity to make a meaningful or effective determination on the matter of this Committee’s decision, due to the timescales involved.
In terms of Standing Order 15(6), Councillors Cameron, Greig, Jaffrey, McCaig, May, Noble, Samarai, Stewart and Townson declared dissent in relation to the preceding Committee decision.
Supporting documents: